![]() ![]() (Of course, if this sounds a little too “hands-on” for you, you can always turn the reminder function off). Draftĭo you like a helpful tap on the shoulder, reminding you about something you need to do? Well, you’ll likely enjoy Draft then, because the book writing software not only keeps track of how many words you write per day, it can also email you daily reminders about your daily word count goals. Rather than dreaming of a better fit markdown language, you are likely to do better by using programs that are the best fit for your requirements.It comes with an automatic spell-checker - and a built-in goal reminder system to get you back into shape if you find that you're falling behind on your writing schedule! Another one of the Reedsy Book Editor’s best functions is that it lets you instantly typeset your manuscript to EPUB and print-ready PDF files.Ĭheck it out if: if you want a writing tool that takes care of formatting and conversion for you. Database apps are frequently more flexible, can mix and match components (they can choose to accept markdown syntax and save it internally into a rich text format if they choose or vice versa) and have a higher proportion of users who need Interoperability with word processors.Īt the end of the day, it’s a rapidly evolving PKM scene with new programs emerging all the time. You’ll have noticed that Interoperability between markdown editors and rich text programs is typically poor, and many markdown editors are dead set against making it easier.įiles based markdown editors are stuck with pure markdown. Rich text programs, of course, integrate both the text and display into one file already. Not impossible but a little oppositional to the current markdown ethos. In which case, your editor would have to translate your WYSIWYG instructions into the yaml. The question would be where would that CSS be saved on a per document basis. Some of what you are looking for is done through CSS. Most programmers and heavy plaintext users aren’t interested in the same features as you. Some of what you want could be achievable through a new plaintext language, but establishing it would be very slow going. But markdown is old and not designed for the uses you describe. I don’t see how you can achieve this with any legitimate extension of markdown. ![]() ![]() it’s 2022 why we still in the 2002? I wish to do my title the way I can with latex.įor me this features is what I wish for in a new Markdown flavor. text position and direction, just click where I want and start typing. WYTIWYG when printing to PDF, markdown doesn’t support pagination, good luck with getting what you want in PDF form. ![]() I can’t use different fonts for different lines. I can’t position the images|charts|figures in a place I want, like a long side the text or in other difficult positions, like the way magazines or academic journal can do. I can’t style it the way I would with dedicated editors for technical and academic writings and long form writing (aka ebooks) editors. The most thing I miss about markdown is styling the text. For me, as I wish for markdown that work for blogposts, notes and knowledge management, technical and academic writings and long form writing aka ebooks, I miss a lot in markdown.įor me. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |